Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Armenia
83.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
57.0%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 83.4% against 57.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 26.4%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.5 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 72.0% | 54.2% | 17.7% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 64.8% | 57.0% | 7.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 83.4% against 57.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 26.4%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group