Argentina vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Argentina
19.4%
in 2022
Serbia
20.3%
in 2022
Argentina rank
18th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Argentina
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 20.3% against 19.4% in Argentina, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.0% | 36.3% | 9.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 18.6% | 19.5% | 0.9% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Argentina or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 20.3% against 19.4% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Argentina and Serbia?
- 0.9%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Argentina ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group