Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Costa Rica
24.3%
in 2022
El Salvador
20.8%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
18th
El Salvador rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Costa Rica
- El Salvador
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 24.3% against 20.8% in El Salvador, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 18th and El Salvador ranks 20th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.1% | 37.6% | 24.5% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 18.4% | 36.3% | 17.8% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 21.8% | 21.4% | 0.5% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
- Costa Rica, at 24.3% against 20.8% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 3.5%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th and El Salvador ranks 20th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group