Armenia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Armenia
52.7%
in 2022
Viet Nam
117.9%
in 2020
Armenia rank
5th
Viet Nam rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Armenia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 117.9% against 52.7% in Armenia, a difference of 65.2%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 2.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.8% | 40.5% | 30.3% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 60.8% | 117.9% | 57.1% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Armenia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 117.9% against 52.7% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 65.2%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Armenia ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group