Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Costa Rica
19.3%
in 2022
El Salvador
17.6%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
20th
El Salvador rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Costa Rica
- El Salvador
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 19.3% against 17.6% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 20th and El Salvador ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.0% | 36.7% | 20.7% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 31.8% | 15.2% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 19.5% | 17.6% | 1.9% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
- Costa Rica, at 19.3% against 17.6% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 1.7%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Costa Rica ranks 20th and El Salvador ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group