Costa Rica vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Costa Rica
40.5%
in 2022
Panama
38.7%
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
21st
Panama rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Costa Rica
- Panama
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 40.5% against 38.7% in Panama, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 21st and Panama ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.8% | 41.4% | 7.4% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 36.8% | 37.7% | 0.9% | Panama |
| 2020s | 43.1% | 34.6% | 8.4% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Costa Rica or Panama?
- Costa Rica, at 40.5% against 38.7% in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Costa Rica and Panama?
- 1.8%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Panama?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Costa Rica and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Costa Rica ranks 21st and Panama ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group