Chile vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
38.5%
in 2022
Panama
38.7%
in 2023
Chile rank
24th
Panama rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 38.7% against 38.5% in Chile, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Panama ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and Panama ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.1% | 41.0% | 3.9% | Panama |
| 2010s | 30.5% | 37.5% | 7.0% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Panama?
- Panama, at 38.7% against 38.5% in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Panama?
- 0.2%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 24th and Panama ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group