Armenia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
43.9%
in 2022
Uruguay
49.4%
in 2022
Armenia rank
19th
Uruguay rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 49.4% against 43.9% in Armenia, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Uruguay ahead.
Armenia ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.4% | 42.9% | 3.5% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 46.7% | 51.0% | 4.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 46.5% | 49.4% | 2.9% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 49.4% against 43.9% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Uruguay?
- 5.5%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group