Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
43.9%
in 2022
Mongolia
46.8%
in 2020
Armenia rank
19th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 46.8% against 43.9% in Armenia, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.9% | 43.7% | 1.2% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 46.2% | 42.8% | 3.4% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 51.0% | 46.8% | 4.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 46.8% against 43.9% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 2.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group