Argentina vs Chile: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Argentina
37.8%
in 2022
Chile
38.5%
in 2022
Argentina rank
25th
Chile rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Argentina
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 38.5% against 37.8% in Argentina, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 25th and Chile ranks 24th of 34 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.6% | 37.9% | 11.8% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 48.8% | 32.0% | 16.8% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 38.3% | 33.8% | 4.5% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Argentina or Chile?
- Chile, at 38.5% against 37.8% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Argentina and Chile?
- 0.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Argentina ranks 25th and Chile ranks 24th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group