Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
44.5%
in 2020
Uruguay
48.3%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
18th
Uruguay rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 48.3% against 44.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.5% | 42.9% | 3.6% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 41.0% | 43.5% | 2.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 44.5% | 48.4% | 3.9% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 48.3% against 44.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 3.8%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group