Ecuador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Ecuador
40.6%
in 2022
Mongolia
44.5%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
20th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 44.5% against 40.6% in Ecuador, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.5% | 41.2% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 44.5% | 14.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 44.5% against 40.6% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 3.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Ecuador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group