Colombia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Colombia
54.2%
in 2022
South Africa
62.4%
in 2021
Colombia rank
11th
South Africa rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Colombia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 62.4% against 54.2% in Colombia, a difference of 8.2%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Colombia ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 8th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.1% | 70.8% | 21.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 65.0% | 59.2% | 5.8% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Colombia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 62.4% against 54.2% in Colombia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Colombia and South Africa?
- 8.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Colombia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Colombia ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 8th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group