Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
47.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
44.5%
in 2020
Armenia rank
16th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 47.3% against 44.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Armenia ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.8% | 46.5% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 46.6% | 41.2% | 5.5% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 55.7% | 44.5% | 11.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Armenia, at 47.3% against 44.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 2.8%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group