Armenia vs Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
47.3%
in 2022
Brazil
50.6%
in 2022
Armenia rank
16th
Brazil rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 50.6% against 47.3% in Armenia, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Armenia ranks 16th and Brazil ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.8% | 60.8% | 17.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 49.1% | 55.7% | 6.6% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 52.7% | 49.5% | 3.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 50.6% against 47.3% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Brazil?
- 3.3%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 16th and Brazil ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group