Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
53.6%
in 2020
Peru
48.5%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
13th
Peru rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 53.6% against 48.5% in Peru, a difference of 5.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 13th and Peru ranks 16th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.3% | 37.4% | 6.0% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 44.5% | 50.7% | 6.3% | Peru |
| 2020s | 53.6% | 25.6% | 28.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 53.6% against 48.5% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Peru?
- 5.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 13th and Peru ranks 16th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group