Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Ecuador
47.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
47.2%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 47.9% against 47.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.9% | 47.0% | 15.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 33.9% | 47.2% | 13.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 47.9% against 47.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Ecuador ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group