Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Costa Rica
45.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
47.2%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
21st
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 47.2% against 45.8% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 21st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.9% | 47.0% | 2.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 54.2% | 47.2% | 7.0% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 47.2% against 45.8% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Costa Rica ranks 21st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group