Colombia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Colombia
57.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
53.6%
in 2020
Colombia rank
10th
Mongolia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Colombia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 57.7% against 53.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 31 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.2% | 44.5% | 6.7% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 62.4% | 53.6% | 8.9% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Colombia or Mongolia?
- Colombia, at 57.7% against 53.6% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Colombia and Mongolia?
- 4.1%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Colombia ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group