Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
45.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
47.2%
in 2020
Chile rank
20th
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 47.2% against 45.9% in Chile, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 20th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.5% | 31.3% | 7.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 32.6% | 48.3% | 15.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 32.3% | 47.2% | 14.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 47.2% against 45.9% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 20th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group