Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
64.9%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
60.3%
in 2019
Brazil rank
6th
Sri Lanka rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 64.9% against 60.3% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Brazil ranks 6th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.2% | 52.3% | 7.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 67.7% | 61.6% | 6.1% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 64.9% against 60.3% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 4.6%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 6th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group