Brazil vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
64.9%
in 2022
Serbia
67.0%
in 2022
Brazil rank
6th
Serbia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 67.0% against 64.9% in Brazil, a difference of 2.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 31 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 67.6% | 57.4% | 10.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 67.2% | 65.2% | 2.0% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 67.0% against 64.9% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Serbia?
- 2.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group