Armenia vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
41.1%
in 2022
Costa Rica
45.8%
in 2022
Armenia rank
24th
Costa Rica rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 45.8% against 41.1% in Armenia, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Armenia ranks 24th and Costa Rica ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.6% | 53.1% | 23.5% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 44.2% | 44.2% | 0.0% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 41.9% | 48.9% | 7.0% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 45.8% against 41.1% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 4.7%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 24th and Costa Rica ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group