Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
55.2%
in 2020
Uruguay
57.8%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
13th
Uruguay rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 57.8% against 55.2% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.6%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 13th and Uruguay ranks 10th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.3% | 52.7% | 10.4% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 42.0% | 52.8% | 10.8% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 55.2% | 59.6% | 4.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 57.8% against 55.2% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 2.6%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 13th and Uruguay ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group