Colombia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Colombia
63.9%
in 2022
South Africa
75.1%
in 2021
Colombia rank
8th
South Africa rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Colombia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 75.1% against 63.9% in Colombia, a difference of 11.2%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Colombia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.2% | 70.5% | 14.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 71.9% | 70.0% | 1.9% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Colombia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 75.1% against 63.9% in Colombia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Colombia and South Africa?
- 11.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Colombia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Colombia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group