Chile vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Chile
32.9%
in 2022
Peru
33.4%
in 2022
Chile rank
31st
Peru rank
30th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 33.4% against 32.9% in Chile, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Chile ranks 31st and Peru ranks 30th of 34 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.2% | 43.7% | 1.5% | Peru |
| 2010s | 34.7% | 36.3% | 1.7% | Peru |
| 2020s | 33.2% | 36.0% | 2.8% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Chile or Peru?
- Peru, at 33.4% against 32.9% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Chile and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Chile ranks 31st and Peru ranks 30th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group