Brazil vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
60.2%
in 2022
Serbia
70.3%
in 2022
Brazil rank
9th
Serbia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 70.3% against 60.2% in Brazil, a difference of 10.1%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 64.6% | 66.3% | 1.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 59.9% | 70.8% | 10.9% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 70.3% against 60.2% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Serbia?
- 10.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group