Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Belarus
79.0%
in 2019
Poland
96.4%
in 2019
Belarus rank
4th
Poland rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 96.4% against 79.0% in Belarus, a difference of 17.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.3% | 81.2% | 17.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 76.6% | 83.4% | 6.8% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 96.4% against 79.0% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Belarus and Poland?
- 17.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group