Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Argentina
44.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
47.0%
in 2020
Argentina rank
21st
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 47.0% against 44.7% in Argentina, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 21st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 34 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8% | 37.7% | 25.2% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 52.3% | 46.1% | 6.2% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 48.5% | 47.0% | 1.5% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 47.0% against 44.7% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Argentina ranks 21st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group