El Salvador vs Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
El Salvador
20.1%
in 2022
Georgia
21.3%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
24th
Georgia rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- El Salvador
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 21.3% against 20.1% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 24th and Georgia ranks 21st of 36 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.2% | 41.3% | 6.1% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 19.9% | 21.3% | 1.4% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, El Salvador or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 21.3% against 20.1% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between El Salvador and Georgia?
- 1.2%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- El Salvador ranks 24th and Georgia ranks 21st of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group