Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kosovo
49.9%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
57.1%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 57.1% against 49.9% in Kosovo, a difference of 7.2%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 36 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.8% | 31.9% | 46.9% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 49.8% | 48.2% | 1.6% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 57.1% against 49.9% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group