Honduras vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Honduras
25.5%
in 2019
Mongolia
27.4%
in 2020
Honduras rank
14th
Mongolia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 27.4% against 25.5% in Honduras, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 36 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 12.2% | 12.4% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 22.1% | 6.1% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 27.4% against 25.5% in Honduras as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 1.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Honduras ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group