Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Georgia
23.9%
in 2021
Serbia
24.0%
in 2022
Georgia rank
16th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 24.0% against 23.9% in Georgia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.2% | 39.1% | 12.9% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 23.9% | 21.0% | 3.0% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 24.0% against 23.9% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Georgia ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group