Costa Rica vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Costa Rica
22.9%
in 2022
Serbia
24.0%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
17th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Costa Rica
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 24.0% against 22.9% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.3% | 41.2% | 21.8% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 23.6% | 22.5% | 1.1% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Costa Rica or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 24.0% against 22.9% in Costa Rica as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 1.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Costa Rica ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group