Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Chile
17.0%
in 2022
Uruguay
17.3%
in 2022
Chile rank
25th
Uruguay rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 17.3% against 17.0% in Chile, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Chile ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 24th of 36 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.2% | 26.3% | 6.1% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 15.3% | 17.4% | 2.1% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Chile or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 17.3% against 17.0% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Chile and Uruguay?
- 0.3%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Chile ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 24th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group