Armenia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Armenia
66.5%
in 2022
South Africa
52.7%
in 2021
Armenia rank
3rd
South Africa rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 66.5% against 52.7% in South Africa, a difference of 13.8%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85.0% | 48.7% | 36.3% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 75.4% | 54.8% | 20.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Armenia or South Africa?
- Armenia, at 66.5% against 52.7% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Armenia and South Africa?
- 13.8%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group