Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Mongolia
22.0%
in 2020
Uruguay
21.2%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
22nd
Uruguay rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 22.0% against 21.2% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.0% | 14.5% | 4.5% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 21.4% | 3.6% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 22.0% | 18.5% | 3.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 22.0% against 21.2% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 0.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Mongolia ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group