Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kosovo
56.7%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
58.5%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 58.5% against 56.7% in Kosovo, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.4% | 46.3% | 26.1% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 54.7% | 57.8% | 3.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 58.5% against 56.7% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group