El Salvador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
El Salvador
22.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
22.0%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
21st
Mongolia rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 22.4% against 22.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 35 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.2% | 15.0% | 21.3% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 37.4% | 17.3% | 20.1% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 22.4% against 22.0% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.4%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- El Salvador ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group