Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
29.8%
in 2021
Serbia
36.4%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
13th
Serbia rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 36.4% against 29.8% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 6.6%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 11th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.5% | 32.8% | 6.3% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 27.1% | 39.8% | 12.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 29.8% | 22.6% | 7.3% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 36.4% against 29.8% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 6.6%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 11th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group