Chile vs Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Chile
15.5%
in 2022
Georgia
16.0%
in 2021
Chile rank
29th
Georgia rank
28th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 16.0% against 15.5% in Chile, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.
Chile ranks 29th and Georgia ranks 28th of 35 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.9% | 69.6% | 51.8% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 11.0% | 11.8% | 0.7% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Chile or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 16.0% against 15.5% in Chile as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Chile and Georgia?
- 0.5%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Chile ranks 29th and Georgia ranks 28th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group