Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Brazil
19.2%
in 2022
Mongolia
22.0%
in 2020
Brazil rank
24th
Mongolia rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 22.0% against 19.2% in Brazil, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 24th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.7% | 19.0% | 7.8% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 35.1% | 18.9% | 16.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 14.8% | 22.0% | 7.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 22.0% against 19.2% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 2.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Brazil ranks 24th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group