Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Belarus
10.5%
in 2019
Ecuador
10.9%
in 2022
Belarus rank
33rd
Ecuador rank
32nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 10.9% against 10.5% in Belarus, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belarus ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.2% | 34.7% | 25.5% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 11.6% | 18.2% | 6.7% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 10.9% against 10.5% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 0.4%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group