Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kosovo
51.7%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
56.8%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 56.8% against 51.7% in Kosovo, a difference of 5.1%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.7% | 36.5% | 38.2% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 50.3% | 50.2% | 0.1% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 56.8% against 51.7% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group