Peru vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Peru
34.9%
in 2022
South Africa
39.7%
in 2021
Peru rank
30th
South Africa rank
27th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 39.7% against 34.9% in Peru, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 27th of 34 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.1% | 137.5% | 99.4% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 40.8% | 54.2% | 13.3% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 39.7% against 34.9% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Peru and South Africa?
- 4.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Peru ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 27th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group