Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Mongolia
47.2%
in 2020
Viet Nam
47.9%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
20th
Viet Nam rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 47.9% against 47.2% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 17th of 34 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 46.4% | 50.3% | 3.9% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 47.2% | 47.9% | 0.7% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 47.9% against 47.2% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.7%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Mongolia ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 17th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group