Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Chile
46.3%
in 2022
Uruguay
46.3%
in 2022
Chile rank
21st
Uruguay rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 46.3% against 46.3% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.0% | 40.3% | 6.7% | Chile |
| 2010s | 36.5% | 48.5% | 12.0% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 40.3% | 46.8% | 6.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Chile or Uruguay?
- Chile, at 46.3% against 46.3% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Chile and Uruguay?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Chile ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group