Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Brazil
62.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
55.1%
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 62.3% against 55.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 7.2%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.3% | 44.1% | 22.3% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 67.4% | 55.9% | 11.5% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 55.2% | 55.1% | 0.1% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 62.3% against 55.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7.2%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group