Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Kazakhstan
59.4%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
53.7%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 59.4% against 53.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47.6% | 59.1% | 11.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 60.3% | 53.7% | 6.5% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 59.4% against 53.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.7%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group