Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Costa Rica
45.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
45.4%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
19th
Mongolia rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 45.4% against 45.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.6% | 46.9% | 7.3% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 51.9% | 45.4% | 6.5% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 45.4% against 45.4% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 0.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Costa Rica ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group